Differences between revisions 2 and 3
|
Size: 500
Comment:
|
Size: 536
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 3: | Line 3: |
| We then move into ''how'' property rights come about, or equivalently to ''allocation''. It is easy to rule out any non-symmetric (universal) rule, like, "John will dole out all property and decide everything" as unjust (see Molyneux's [[Books/UniversallyPreferableBehaviour]] for example). | We then move into ''how'' property rights come about, or equivalently to ''allocation''. It is easy to rule out any non-symmetric (universal) rule, like, "John will dole out all property and decide everything" as unjust (see Molyneux's ''[[Books/UniversallyPreferableBehaviour|Universally Preferable Behavior]]'' for example). |
Given that property is required for very survival (people need somewhere to live, food to eat, and more complex property for living beyond mere survival), it is a part of the human condition.
We then move into how property rights come about, or equivalently to allocation. It is easy to rule out any non-symmetric (universal) rule, like, "John will dole out all property and decide everything" as unjust (see Molyneux's Universally Preferable Behavior for example).
(DBR)